Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$51.60
Change-$0.52 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$44.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. NGCAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. NGCAX (53M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: NGCAX (0.83) vs FCHKX (0.44). FCHKX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FCHKX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NGCAX (1.64). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FCHKX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.34 vs. NGCAX (34.69). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 0.95 vs. NGCAX (-37.26).
| FCHKX | NGCAX | FCHKX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.49 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.64 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.350 | 33.714 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 53M | 3,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.34 | 34.69 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.58 | 38.69 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.95 | -37.26 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.00 | 25.97 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement