Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$51.32
Change+$0.37 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.23
Change+$0.46 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.51M
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. NGCAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. NGCAX (50.5M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: NGCAX (0.86) vs FCHKX (0.46). FCHKX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FCHKX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NGCAX (1.64). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FCHKX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.07 vs. NGCAX (25.05). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 1.62 vs. NGCAX (-36.06).
| FCHKX | NGCAX | FCHKX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.49 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.64 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.219 | 27.008 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 50.5M | 3,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.86 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.07 | 25.05 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.07 | 13.28 | 505% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.62 | -36.06 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.50 | 22.63 | 479% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement