Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$51.11
Change-$0.29 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$43.73
Change-$0.09 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. NGCAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. NGCAX (52.5M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: NGCAX (0.79) vs FCHKX (0.45). FCHKX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FCHKX (17 years) vs NGCAX (28 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NGCAX (1.64). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FCHKX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.05 vs. NGCAX (30.68). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 4.50 vs. NGCAX (-37.11).
| FCHKX | NGCAX | FCHKX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.49 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.64 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.645 | 31.519 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 52.5M | 3,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.79 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.05 | 30.68 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.05 | 40.74 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.50 | -37.11 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.37 | 22.30 | 351% |