Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs NGCAX
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$56.74
Change+$4.13 (+7.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.44
Change-$3.38 (-7.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
FCHKX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. NGCAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. NGCAX (49.9M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: NGCAX (1.77) vs FCHKX (0.79). FCHKX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FCHKX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than NGCAX (1.74). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FCHKX (250) vs NGCAX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.38 vs. NGCAX (27.96). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -3.52 vs. NGCAX (-44.76).
| FCHKX | NGCAX | FCHKX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.49 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.74 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.820 | 2.191 | 494% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 49.9M | 4,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.77 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.38 | 27.96 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 6.83 | 981% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.52 | -44.76 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.07 | 50.40 | 367% |