Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs MICHX
FCHKX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs MICHX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$47.08
Change+$0.63 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$11.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.64M
FCHKX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. MICHX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Buy and MICHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MICHX (71.6M). MICHX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: MICHX (1.23) vs FCHKX (0.50). FCHKX was incepted earlier than MICHX: FCHKX (17 years) vs MICHX (8 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). MICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICHX: FCHKX (0) vs MICHX (100000). MICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.20 vs. FCHKX (42.88). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 0.17 vs. MICHX (-36.69).
| FCHKX | MICHX | FCHKX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.20 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.50 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.913 | 28.587 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 71.6M | 1,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.23 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.88 | 50.20 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.04 | 6.52 | 829% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.17 | -36.69 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.88 | N/A | - |