Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs LNGZX
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$51.11
Change-$0.29 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$48.58
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. LNGZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. LNGZX (52.5M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: LNGZX (0.87) vs FCHKX (0.45). FCHKX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FCHKX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FCHKX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.81 vs. LNGZX (31.00). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 5.09 vs. LNGZX (-36.25).
| FCHKX | LNGZX | FCHKX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.24 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.39 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.437 | 31.760 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 52.5M | 3,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.87 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.81 | 31.00 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.17 | 41.62 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.09 | -36.25 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.39 | 26.40 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement