Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs LNGZX
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$51.32
Change+$0.37 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$46.93
Change+$0.51 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.51M
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. LNGZX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Buy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. LNGZX (50.5M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: LNGZX (0.94) vs FCHKX (0.46). FCHKX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FCHKX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.39). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FCHKX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.19 vs. LNGZX (25.31). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 0.89 vs. LNGZX (-35.35).
| FCHKX | LNGZX | FCHKX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.24 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.39 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.208 | 27.285 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 50.5M | 3,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.94 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.19 | 25.31 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.91 | 14.09 | 489% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.89 | -35.35 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.68 | 26.60 | 397% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement