Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs LNGZX
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$56.74
Change+$4.13 (+7.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.18
Change-$3.72 (-7.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
FCHKX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. LNGZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. LNGZX (49.9M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: LNGZX (1.81) vs FCHKX (0.79). FCHKX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FCHKX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than LNGZX (1.49). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FCHKX (250) vs LNGZX (2000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.38 vs. LNGZX (28.32). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -3.52 vs. LNGZX (-44.11).
| FCHKX | LNGZX | FCHKX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.24 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.49 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.820 | 2.232 | 485% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 49.9M | 4,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.81 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.38 | 28.32 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 7.66 | 875% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.52 | -44.11 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.07 | 55.34 | 334% |