Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs GSAEX
FCHKX vs GSAEX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs GSAEX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$56.74
Change+$4.13 (+7.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.78
Change-$0.55 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.23M
FCHKX vs GSAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. GSAEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and GSAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. GSAEX (42.2M). GSAEX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: GSAEX (1.40) vs FCHKX (0.79). FCHKX was incepted earlier than GSAEX: FCHKX (18 years) vs GSAEX (12 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FCHKX (1.92). GSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). GSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCHKX: GSAEX (0) vs FCHKX (250). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.38 vs. GSAEX (36.52). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -3.52 vs. GSAEX (-36.70).
| FCHKX | GSAEX | FCHKX / GSAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.21 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 2.05 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.820 | 4.313 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 42.2M | 4,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.40 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.38 | 36.52 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 17.11 | 392% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.52 | -36.70 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.07 | 58.62 | 316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement