Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs FHKTX
FCHKX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs FHKTX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$56.74
Change+$4.13 (+7.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$59.08
Change+$4.17 (+7.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
FCHKX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. FHKTX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX (2.07B) and FHKTX (2.07B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FHKTX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: FHKTX (1.15) vs FCHKX (0.79). FCHKX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: FCHKX (18 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). FCHKX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). FCHKX (34.00) and FHKTX (34.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCHKX (250) and FHKTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKTX (56.15) and FCHKX (55.38) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. FCHKX (-3.52).
| FCHKX | FHKTX | FCHKX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.43 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.43 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.820 | 10.865 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 2.07B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.38 | 56.15 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 69.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.52 | -0.83 | 422% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.07 | 196.99 | 94% |