Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs FHKAX
FCHKX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs FHKAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$47.08
Change+$0.63 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$49.60
Change+$0.66 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
FCHKX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. FHKAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX (1.39B) and FHKAX (1.39B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FHKAX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: FHKAX (0.97) vs FCHKX (0.50). FCHKX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: FCHKX (17 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). FCHKX (30.00) and FHKAX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCHKX (0) and FHKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKAX (43.97) and FCHKX (42.88) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.39 vs. FCHKX (0.17).
| FCHKX | FHKAX | FCHKX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.18 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.18 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.913 | 27.581 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 1.39B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.97 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.88 | 43.97 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.04 | 57.49 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.17 | 4.39 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.88 | 88.86 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement