Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs RHGTX
FCGTX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RHGTX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (50.4B) and RHGTX (50.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCGTX (1.34) vs RHGTX (1.23). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCGTX (9 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RHGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RHGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RHGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (13.96) and RHGTX (13.82) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (36.91) and RHGTX (36.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RHGTX | FCGTX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.941 | 19.764 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.4B | 50.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.23 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.96 | 13.82 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.67 | 45.21 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 36.04 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers