Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs NSFHX
FCGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. NSFHX (8.03M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: NSFHX (1.58) vs FCGTX (1.44). FCGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FCGTX (9 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and NSFHX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.17 vs. NSFHX (-29.32). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.72 vs. NSFHX (-19.52).
| FCGTX | NSFHX | FCGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.48 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.20 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.366 | -30.300 | -41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 8.03M | 606,854% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.58 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.17 | -29.32 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | -13.49 | -301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.72 | -19.52 | -234% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement