Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGIX vs NPFCX
FCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FCGIX vs NPFCX
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$22.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.24M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$69.74
Change+$0.23 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.71B
FCGIX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGIX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGIX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. FCGIX (43.2M). FCGIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FCGIX (0.38) vs NPFCX (0.00). FCGIX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FCGIX (9 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). FCGIX (1.49) and NPFCX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (19.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: NPFCX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. FCGIX (6.95). FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.14 vs. NPFCX (28.64).
| FCGIX | NPFCX | FCGIX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.48 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.48 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.142 | 20.449 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.2M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 13.49 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.57 | 47.67 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.14 | 28.64 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement