Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGEX vs RNPFX
FCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FCGEX vs RNPFX
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$22.13
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.24M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$75.37
Change+$0.24 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.71B
FCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGEX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGEX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. FCGEX (43.2M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FCGEX: RNPFX (0.69) vs FCGEX (0.19). FCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FCGEX (9 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FCGEX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGEX (19.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGEX: RNPFX (250) vs FCGEX (15000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. FCGEX (6.61). FCGEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.34 vs. RNPFX (35.27).
| FCGEX | RNPFX | FCGEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.46 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.46 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.901 | 21.486 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.2M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.69 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | 14.98 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.52 | 51.80 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.34 | 35.27 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement