Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGBX vs FIFAX
FCGBX vs FIFAX Comparison
Open Charts FCGBX vs FIFAX
Templeton Global Dynamic Income C
Price$2.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets314.86M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer F3
Price$27.93
Change+$0.16 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
FCGBX vs FIFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGBX vs. FIFAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGBX is a Buy and FIFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIFAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FCGBX (315M). FIFAX pays higher dividends than FCGBX: FIFAX (3.78) vs FCGBX (3.16). FCGBX was incepted earlier than FIFAX: FCGBX (14 years) vs FIFAX (9 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FIFAX (0.26). FCGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FIFAX: FCGBX (1000) vs FIFAX (1000000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.05 vs. FIFAX (10.55). FIFAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.36 vs. FCGBX (17.72).
| FCGBX | FIFAX | FCGBX / FIFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.26 | 754% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.26 | 773% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.778 | 16.417 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.78 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.05 | 10.55 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.06 | 28.08 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.72 | 37.36 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers