Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCG vs XOP
FCG vs XOP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCG vs. XOP commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCG is a Hold and XOP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOP has more net assets: 1.7B vs. FCG (339M). XOP has a higher annual dividend yield than FCG: XOP (-4.932) vs FCG (-9.003). FCG was incepted earlier than XOP: FCG (18 years) vs XOP (19 years). XOP (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FCG (0.57). FCG has a higher turnover XOP (33.00) vs XOP (33.00).
| FCG | XOP | FCG / XOP | |
| Gain YTD | -9.003 | -4.932 | 183% |
| Net Assets | 339M | 1.7B | 20% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.35 | 163% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 33.00 | 115% |
| Yield | 2.66 | 2.42 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCG has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCG jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCG | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTDR - FCG | 93% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| OVV - FCG | 93% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MGY - FCG | 92% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CHRD - FCG | 91% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| PR - FCG | 91% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
More | ||||
XOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOP has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOP jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOP | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| MTDR - XOP | 93% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| OVV - XOP | 93% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| CHRD - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MGY - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| DVN - XOP | 91% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
More | ||||