Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCG vs XOP
FCG vs XOP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCG vs. XOP commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCG is a Hold and XOP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOP has more net assets: 1.79B vs. FCG (328M). XOP has a higher annual dividend yield than FCG: XOP (-4.850) vs FCG (-5.535). FCG was incepted earlier than XOP: FCG (18 years) vs XOP (19 years). XOP (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FCG (0.60). FCG has a higher turnover XOP (36.00) vs XOP (36.00).
| FCG | XOP | FCG / XOP | |
| Gain YTD | -5.535 | -4.850 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 328M | 1.79B | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.35 | 171% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 36.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 2.80 | 2.51 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RGACX | 82.10 | -0.06 | -0.07% |
| American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3 | |||
| FOPPX | 62.15 | -0.05 | -0.08% |
| Franklin Growth Opportunities R6 | |||
| DNLRX | 63.61 | -0.23 | -0.36% |
| BNY Mellon Active MidCap I | |||
| AISBX | 13.45 | -0.07 | -0.52% |
| Aristotle Small Cap Eq C | |||
| NEFJX | 20.16 | -0.21 | -1.03% |
| Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap A | |||
FCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCG has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCG jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCG | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| MTDR - FCG | 94% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| OVV - FCG | 93% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| PR - FCG | 92% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| MGY - FCG | 91% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| CHRD - FCG | 91% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||
XOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOP has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOP jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOP | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| MTDR - XOP | 93% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| OVV - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| PR - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| MGY - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| CHRD - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||