Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCG vs XOP
FCG vs XOP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCG vs. XOP commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCG is a Hold and XOP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOP has more net assets: 1.88B vs. FCG (340M). XOP has a higher annual dividend yield than FCG: XOP (-1.297) vs FCG (-3.559). FCG was incepted earlier than XOP: FCG (18 years) vs XOP (19 years). XOP (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FCG (0.60). FCG has a higher turnover XOP (36.00) vs XOP (36.00).
| FCG | XOP | FCG / XOP | |
| Gain YTD | -3.559 | -1.297 | 274% |
| Net Assets | 340M | 1.88B | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.35 | 171% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 36.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 2.87 | 2.56 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCG has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCG jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCG | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| MTDR - FCG | 94% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| OVV - FCG | 94% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PR - FCG | 93% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| MGY - FCG | 92% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CHRD - FCG | 91% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
XOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOP has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOP jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOP | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| MTDR - XOP | 94% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| OVV - XOP | 93% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PR - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| MGY - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CHRD - XOP | 92% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||