Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFY vs RECS
FCFY vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCFY vs RECS
First Trust S&P 500 Div Fr CA Flw ETF
Price$26.59
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Volume$501
Net Assets1.34M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.57
Change-$0.61 (-1.48%)
Volume$624.29K
Net Assets4.36B
FCFY vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFY vs. RECS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFY is a Hold and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.36B vs. FCFY (1.34M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCFY: RECS (18.949) vs FCFY (9.638). FCFY was incepted earlier than RECS: FCFY (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCFY (0.60). FCFY has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCFY | RECS | FCFY / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 9.638 | 18.949 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 1.34M | 4.36B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 49.00 | 129% |
| Yield | 1.70 | 0.59 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCFY | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCFY and DHI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCFY and DHI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFY | 100% | N/A | ||
| DHI - FCFY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| PHM - FCFY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MAS - FCFY | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| NVR - FCFY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LEN - FCFY | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||