Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFY vs RECS
FCFY vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCFY vs RECS
First Trust S&P 500 Div Fr CA Flw ETF
Price$28.03
Change+$0.13 (+0.47%)
Volume$136
Net Assets1.4M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.38
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
Volume$749
Net Assets4.78B
FCFY vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFY vs. RECS commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFY is a Hold and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.78B vs. FCFY (1.4M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCFY: RECS (19.324) vs FCFY (15.762). FCFY was incepted earlier than RECS: FCFY (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCFY (0.60). FCFY has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCFY | RECS | FCFY / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 15.762 | 19.324 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 1.4M | 4.78B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.15 | 400% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 49.00 | 129% |
| Yield | 1.70 | 0.92 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCFY | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCFY and MAS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCFY and MAS's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFY | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| MAS - FCFY | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| PHM - FCFY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| DHI - FCFY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
| NVR - FCFY | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| SWK - FCFY | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||