FCFS
Price
$150.83
Change
+$1.09 (+0.73%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.69B
48 days until earnings call
SLM
Price
$31.77
Change
+$0.90 (+2.92%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.62B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCFS vs SLM

Header iconFCFS vs SLM Comparison
Open Charts FCFS vs SLMBanner chart's image
FirstCash Holdings
Price$150.83
Change+$1.09 (+0.73%)
Volume$147.64K
Capitalization6.69B
SLM
Price$31.77
Change+$0.90 (+2.92%)
Volume$1.58M
Capitalization6.62B
FCFS vs SLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCFS vs. SLM commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFS is a Buy and SLM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FCFS: $150.83 vs. SLM: $31.77)
Brand notoriety: FCFS: Not notable vs. SLM: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCFS: 46% vs. SLM: 76%
Market capitalization -- FCFS: $6.69B vs. SLM: $6.62B
FCFS [@Savings Banks] is valued at $6.69B. SLM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCFS and SLM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the short-term than FCFS.

Price Growth

FCFS (@Savings Banks) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while SLM (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

SLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.51% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($6.69B) and SLM($6.62B) have the same market capitalization . FCFS has higher P/E ratio than SLM: FCFS (23.20) vs SLM (15.42). FCFS YTD gains are higher at: 46.935 vs. SLM (16.669). FCFS has less debt than SLM: FCFS (2.02B) vs SLM (6.41B).
FCFSSLMFCFS / SLM
Capitalization6.69B6.62B101%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.93516.669282%
P/E Ratio23.2015.42150%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.02B6.41B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCFS vs SLM: Fundamental Ratings
FCFS
SLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1965
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
109
SMR RATING
1..100
5711
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
487
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLM's Valuation (74) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (93). This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (10). This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (57). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SLM (53). This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (48). This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFSSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASVRX10.270.15
+1.48%
American Century Small Cap Value R
GAFFX86.200.90
+1.06%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
DREYX42.080.43
+1.03%
Davis Real Estate Y
FGIAX12.790.01
+0.08%
Nuveen Global Infrastructure A
AGGNX23.19-0.33
-1.40%
American Century Global Gold I

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with CACC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then CACC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
+0.73%
CACC - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
ENVA - FCFS
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
COF - FCFS
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
SLM - FCFS
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
CTOS - FCFS
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
More

SLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLM has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLM jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLM
1D Price
Change %
SLM100%
+3.35%
SYF - SLM
76%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
AXP - SLM
74%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
COF - SLM
74%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
OMF - SLM
74%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
NAVI - SLM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
More