FCFS
Price
$105.54
Change
-$1.55 (-1.45%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:14 PM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
R
Price
$162.21
Change
-$3.46 (-2.09%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:42 PM (EDT)
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FCFS vs R

Header iconFCFS vs R Comparison
Open Charts FCFS vs RBanner chart's image
FirstCash Holdings
Price$105.54
Change-$1.55 (-1.45%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Ryder System
Price$162.21
Change-$3.46 (-2.09%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
FCFS vs R Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCFS vs. R commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFS is a StrongBuy and R is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FCFS: $107.09 vs. R: $165.67)
Brand notoriety: FCFS and R are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCFS: 92% vs. R: 111%
Market capitalization -- FCFS: $5.75B vs. R: $5.32B
FCFS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.75B. R’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FCFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • R’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, R is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while R’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • R’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCFS is a better buy in the short-term than R.

Price Growth

FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.59% price change this week, while R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +4.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

R is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.26% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($5.75B) has a higher market cap than R($5.32B). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than R: FCFS (26.15) vs R (13.76). R YTD gains are higher at: 46.615 vs. FCFS (-0.292). R has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.73B vs. FCFS (907M). R has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. FCFS (127M). FCFS has less debt than R: FCFS (1.92B) vs R (8.15B). R has higher revenues than FCFS: R (11.8B) vs FCFS (3.15B).
FCFSRFCFS / R
Capitalization5.75B5.32B108%
EBITDA907M2.73B33%
Gain YTD-0.29246.615-1%
P/E Ratio26.1513.76190%
Revenue3.15B11.8B27%
Total Cash127M204M62%
Total Debt1.92B8.15B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCFS vs R: Fundamental Ratings
FCFS
R
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
610
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
403
SMR RATING
1..100
6356
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

R's Valuation (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCFS (98). This means that R’s stock grew significantly faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

R's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (40). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

R's SMR Rating (56) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCFS (63). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

R's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (72). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

R's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (78). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with COOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then COOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
-2.42%
COOP - FCFS
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
SLM - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
PFSI - FCFS
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
NAVI - FCFS
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
R - FCFS
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
More

R and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, R has been loosely correlated with URI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if R jumps, then URI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To R
1D Price
Change %
R100%
-1.25%
URI - R
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
AXP - R
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
AL - R
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
HRI - R
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
COF - R
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
More