FCCO
Price
$27.74
Change
+$0.24 (+0.87%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
211.08M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRAF
Price
$48.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
218.67M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCCO vs FRAF

Header iconFCCO vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts FCCO vs FRAFBanner chart's image
First Community
Price$27.74
Change+$0.24 (+0.87%)
Volume$922
Capitalization211.08M
Franklin Financial Services
Price$48.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization218.67M
FCCO vs FRAF Comparison Chart in %
FCCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCCO vs. FRAF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCO is a StrongBuy and FRAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FCCO: $27.50 vs. FRAF: $48.81)
Brand notoriety: FCCO and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCCO: 48% vs. FRAF: 144%
Market capitalization -- FCCO: $211.08M vs. FRAF: $218.67M
FCCO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $211.08M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $218.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than FCCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than FCCO.

Price Growth

FCCO (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.21% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCCO is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($219M) and FCCO($211M) have the same market capitalization . FRAF has higher P/E ratio than FCCO: FRAF (13.99) vs FCCO (11.44). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 68.674 vs. FCCO (17.436). FCCO has more cash in the bank: 32.1M vs. FRAF (27.4M). FCCO has less debt than FRAF: FCCO (2.51M) vs FRAF (224M). FRAF has higher revenues than FCCO: FRAF (76.1M) vs FCCO (67.3M).
FCCOFRAFFCCO / FRAF
Capitalization211M219M96%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.43668.67425%
P/E Ratio11.4413.9982%
Revenue67.3M76.1M88%
Total Cash32.1M27.4M117%
Total Debt2.51M224M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCCO vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
FCCO
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1721
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1910
SMR RATING
1..100
4850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCCO's Valuation (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (57). This means that FCCO’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCCO (19). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

FCCO's SMR Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (50). This means that FCCO’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCCO (48). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCCO (71). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCCOFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLMNF0.09N/A
+0.64%
Palamina Corp
HELFY1.660.01
+0.58%
Hellofresh SE
EFIN62.940.01
+0.02%
Eastern Michigan Financial Corp.
NEXXY4.75N/A
N/A
NEXI S.P.A.
KNYJY33.94-0.17
-0.49%
Kone Oyj

FCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCCO has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCCO jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCCO
1D Price
Change %
FCCO100%
+0.26%
UCB - FCCO
75%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
EWBC - FCCO
73%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
FBP - FCCO
72%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
CWBC - FCCO
72%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
FNB - FCCO
72%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.31%
WNEB - FRAF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
MRBK - FRAF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
FUNC - FRAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
CWBC - FRAF
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
FCCO - FRAF
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
More