Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCBSX vs VEVYX
FCBSX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts FCBSX vs VEVYX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value C
Price$34.92
Change+$0.55 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets764.78M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$48.07
Change+$1.75 (+3.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.2B
FCBSX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCBSX vs. VEVYX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBSX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. FCBSX (765M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than FCBSX: VEVYX (0.89) vs FCBSX (0.21). FCBSX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: FCBSX (25 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). FCBSX (1.67) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). FCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.72 vs. VEVYX (45.00). FCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: FCBSX (1000) vs VEVYX (1000000). FCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. VEVYX (2.79). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 20.54 vs. FCBSX (11.19).
| FCBSX | VEVYX | FCBSX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.66 | 250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.66 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.676 | 6.775 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 765M | 16.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.89 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 2.79 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.14 | 3.61 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.19 | 20.54 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.37 | 88.67 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers