FCAP
Price
$43.59
Change
-$0.09 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.66M
SSBI
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jul 7, 01:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs SSBI

Header iconFCAP vs SSBI Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs SSBIBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$43.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.21%)
Volume$101
Capitalization95.66M
Summit State Bank
Price$11.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization73.61M
FCAP vs SSBI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. SSBI commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Hold and SSBI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $43.68 vs. SSBI: $11.01)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and SSBI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 42% vs. SSBI: 11%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $95.66M vs. SSBI: $73.61M
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.66M. SSBI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $73.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSBI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSBI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCAP and SSBI are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSBI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SSBI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSBI is a better buy in the short-term than FCAP.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.30% price change this week, while SSBI (@Regional Banks) price change was +11.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAP($95.7M) has a higher market cap than SSBI($73.6M). FCAP has higher P/E ratio than SSBI: FCAP (7.67) vs SSBI (6.56). SSBI YTD gains are higher at: 43.922 vs. FCAP (37.339). SSBI has more cash in the bank: 86.6M vs. FCAP (18M). SSBI has less debt than FCAP: SSBI (5.92M) vs FCAP (28M). SSBI has higher revenues than FCAP: SSBI (45.6M) vs FCAP (42.9M).
FCAPSSBIFCAP / SSBI
Capitalization95.7M73.6M130%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.33943.92285%
P/E Ratio7.676.56117%
Revenue42.9M45.6M94%
Total Cash18M86.6M21%
Total Debt28M5.92M473%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs SSBI: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
SSBI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10080
SMR RATING
1..100
4987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
207
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
289

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSBI's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCAP (69) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

SSBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's SMR Rating (49) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSBI (87) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSBI’s over the last 12 months.

SSBI's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (46) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

SSBI's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (20) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCAPSSBI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZREF0.50N/A
N/A
Azure Power Global Limited
NGCRY27.54N/A
N/A
Nagacorp Ltd.
SBMFF0.68N/A
N/A
Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
AFNL171.92N/A
N/A
Amfin Financial Corp.
JRNGF1.48-0.02
-1.37%
Journey Energy Inc.

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCAP and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCAP and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
+2.75%
UBFO - FCAP
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
LNKB - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
OPHC - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
SSBI - FCAP
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
BOTJ - FCAP
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More

SSBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSBI has been loosely correlated with CFBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSBI jumps, then CFBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSBI
1D Price
Change %
SSBI100%
-0.09%
CFBK - SSBI
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
LARK - SSBI
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.36%
ALRS - SSBI
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
CYVF - SSBI
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
WASH - SSBI
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.24%
More