Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAKX vs RGAGX
FCAKX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FCAKX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$47.08
Change-$0.17 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.95B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FCAKX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAKX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAKX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FCAKX (6.95B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FCAKX: RGAGX (0.59) vs FCAKX (0.21). FCAKX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FCAKX (17 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FCAKX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FCAKX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. FCAKX (0.63). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. FCAKX (19.33).
| FCAKX | RGAGX | FCAKX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.30 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.30 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.038 | 16.016 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.95B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.59 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.63 | 18.90 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.13 | 61.40 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.33 | 44.13 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.39 | 102.81 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers