Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAKX vs RGAGX
FCAKX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FCAKX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$43.47
Change-$0.62 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.55B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.43
Change-$0.94 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FCAKX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAKX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAKX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FCAKX (6.55B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FCAKX: RGAGX (0.65) vs FCAKX (0.22). FCAKX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FCAKX (17 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FCAKX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FCAKX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. FCAKX (-7.46). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.11 vs. FCAKX (27.63).
| FCAKX | RGAGX | FCAKX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.30 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.30 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.524 | 5.205 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.55B | 306B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.65 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.46 | 7.67 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.82 | 54.66 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.63 | 51.11 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.33 | 75.62 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement