Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAKX vs RGAGX
FCAKX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FCAKX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$46.30
Change+$0.14 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.81B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
FCAKX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAKX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAKX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FCAKX (6.81B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FCAKX: RGAGX (0.61) vs FCAKX (0.21). FCAKX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FCAKX (17 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FCAKX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FCAKX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. FCAKX (0.68). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. FCAKX (25.56).
| FCAKX | RGAGX | FCAKX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.30 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.30 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.198 | 13.508 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 328B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.61 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.68 | 18.20 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.45 | 59.73 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.56 | 50.83 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.58 | 89.40 | 25% |