Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAKX vs RGAGX
FCAKX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FCAKX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$45.57
Change+$0.36 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.81B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FCAKX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAKX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAKX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FCAKX (6.81B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FCAKX: RGAGX (0.61) vs FCAKX (0.21). FCAKX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FCAKX (17 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FCAKX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FCAKX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. FCAKX (-4.48). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. FCAKX (26.79).
| FCAKX | RGAGX | FCAKX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.30 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.30 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.476 | 11.348 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 323B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.61 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.48 | 11.27 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.50 | 60.98 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.79 | 51.38 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.31 | 89.12 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement