Advertisement
FC vs SECCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and SECCF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSECCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SECCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SECCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +5.33% price change this week, while SECCF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -3.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
FC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.02% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| FC | SECCF | FC / SECCF | |
| Capitalization | 521M | 2.2B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 35.9M | 392M | 9% |
| Gain YTD | -45.822 | 48.187 | -95% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.38 | 12.05 | 244% |
| Revenue | 280M | 4.53B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 34M | 55.8M | 61% |
| Total Debt | 13.2M | 709M | 2% |
FC | SECCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SECCF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (80) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.
SECCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.
FC's SMR Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SECCF (90) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SECCF’s over the last 12 months.
SECCF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (88) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.
SECCF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (74) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.
| FC | SECCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 21% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
FC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.
SECCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SECCF and FC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECCF and FC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SECCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SECCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FC - SECCF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| SPIR - SECCF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| TLPFF - SECCF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| RLXXF - SECCF | 10% Poorly correlated | -5.92% | ||
| SOMLY - SECCF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||