FC
Price
$19.35
Change
-$0.26 (-1.33%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
244.62M
81 days until earnings call
SECCF
Price
$3.12
Change
+$0.09 (+2.97%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FC vs SECCF

Header iconFC vs SECCF Comparison
Open Charts FC vs SECCFBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$19.35
Change-$0.26 (-1.33%)
Volume$173.54K
Capitalization244.62M
Serco Group
Price$3.12
Change+$0.09 (+2.97%)
Volume$261
Capitalization3.08B
FC vs SECCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. SECCF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and SECCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $19.35 vs. SECCF: $3.12)
Brand notoriety: FC and SECCF are both not notable
FC represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while SECCF is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 133% vs. SECCF: 18%
Market capitalization -- FC: $244.62M vs. SECCF: $3.08B
FC [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $244.62M. SECCF’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $3.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSECCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SECCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECCF is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SECCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FC and SECCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FC (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +2.65% price change this week, while SECCF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +7.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.54% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.85% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SECCF($3.08B) has a higher market cap than FC($245M). SECCF has higher P/E ratio than FC: SECCF (45.68) vs FC (24.49). SECCF YTD gains are higher at: 61.399 vs. FC (-48.510). SECCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 327M vs. FC (25.6M). SECCF has more cash in the bank: 183M vs. FC (33.7M). FC has less debt than SECCF: FC (2.35M) vs SECCF (806M). SECCF has higher revenues than FC: SECCF (4.79B) vs FC (280M).
FCSECCFFC / SECCF
Capitalization245M3.08B8%
EBITDA25.6M327M8%
Gain YTD-48.51061.399-79%
P/E Ratio24.4945.6854%
Revenue280M4.79B6%
Total Cash33.7M183M18%
Total Debt2.35M806M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs SECCF: Fundamental Ratings
FC
SECCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5793
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9431
SMR RATING
1..100
5490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SECCF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

SECCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SECCF (90) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SECCF’s over the last 12 months.

SECCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

SECCF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (74) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCSECCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFWGX17.840.02
+0.11%
MFS Global Total Return R1
RWMAX64.34-0.14
-0.22%
American Funds Washington Mutual R1
SPINX21.82-0.06
-0.27%
SEI S&P 500 Index A (SIIT)
NSNCX48.02-0.22
-0.46%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth C
VYMVX18.13-0.09
-0.49%
Voya MI Dynamic SMID Cap R

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-1.33%
RGP - FC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
CASS - FC
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
GHC - FC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
MSA - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SECCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECCF and FC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECCF and FC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECCF
1D Price
Change %
SECCF100%
+2.81%
FC - SECCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
SPIR - SECCF
13%
Poorly correlated
-11.38%
TLPFF - SECCF
11%
Poorly correlated
+8.81%
RLXXF - SECCF
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
SOMLY - SECCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More