FC
Price
$22.10
Change
-$2.07 (-8.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
520.87M
123 days until earnings call
SECCF
Price
$2.70
Change
+$0.16 (+6.30%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FC vs SECCF

Header iconFC vs SECCF Comparison
Open Charts FC vs SECCFBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$22.10
Change-$2.07 (-8.56%)
Volume$467.76K
Capitalization520.87M
Serco Group
Price$2.70
Change+$0.16 (+6.30%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization2.2B
FC vs SECCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. SECCF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and SECCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $22.10 vs. SECCF: $2.70)
Brand notoriety: FC and SECCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 476% vs. SECCF: 179%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. SECCF: $2.2B
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. SECCF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSECCF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SECCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECCF is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SECCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SECCF is a better buy in the short-term than FC.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -5.15% price change this week, while SECCF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +6.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SECCF($2.2B) has a higher market cap than FC($521M). FC has higher P/E ratio than SECCF: FC (29.38) vs SECCF (12.05). SECCF YTD gains are higher at: 39.896 vs. FC (-41.192). SECCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 392M vs. FC (35.9M). SECCF has more cash in the bank: 55.8M vs. FC (34M). FC has less debt than SECCF: FC (13.2M) vs SECCF (709M). SECCF has higher revenues than FC: SECCF (4.53B) vs FC (280M).
FCSECCFFC / SECCF
Capitalization521M2.2B24%
EBITDA35.9M392M9%
Gain YTD-41.19239.896-103%
P/E Ratio29.3812.05244%
Revenue280M4.53B6%
Total Cash34M55.8M61%
Total Debt13.2M709M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs SECCF: Fundamental Ratings
FC
SECCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
3990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
632
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SECCF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

SECCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SECCF (90) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SECCF’s over the last 12 months.

SECCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FC (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

SECCF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (63) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that SECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCSECCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THLCX23.090.24
+1.05%
Thrivent Large Cap Growth S
RAFCX42.030.43
+1.03%
American Funds AMCAP R3
BISCX20.240.17
+0.85%
UBS US Small Cap Growth P
BOPAX25.610.20
+0.79%
Sterling Capital Special Opps A
LMCQX33.240.22
+0.67%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-8.56%
RGP - FC
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.69%
GHC - FC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
CASS - FC
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
AZZ - FC
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More

SECCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SECCF and FC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECCF and FC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECCF
1D Price
Change %
SECCF100%
N/A
FC - SECCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.56%
SPIR - SECCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
TLPFF - SECCF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
RLXXF - SECCF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
SOMLY - SECCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More