FC
Price
$22.71
Change
+$0.40 (+1.79%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
520.87M
18 days until earnings call
RGP
Price
$5.14
Change
+$0.07 (+1.38%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
440.97M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FC vs RGP

Header iconFC vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts FC vs RGPBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$22.71
Change+$0.40 (+1.79%)
Volume$56.2K
Capitalization520.87M
Resources Connection
Price$5.14
Change+$0.07 (+1.38%)
Volume$217.07K
Capitalization440.97M
FC vs RGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. RGP commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a StrongBuy and RGP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $23.52 vs. RGP: $5.22)
Brand notoriety: FC and RGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 48% vs. RGP: 71%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. RGP: $440.97M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. RGP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $440.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGP is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than RGP.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +2.57% price change this week, while RGP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +4.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.57% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than RGP($441M). FC has higher P/E ratio than RGP: FC (29.38) vs RGP (16.42). FC (-37.414) and RGP (-37.735) have similar YTD gains . RGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.1M vs. FC (35.9M). FC has less debt than RGP: FC (13.2M) vs RGP (16.5M). RGP has higher revenues than FC: RGP (705M) vs FC (280M).
FCRGPFC / RGP
Capitalization521M441M118%
EBITDA35.9M46.1M78%
Gain YTD-37.414-37.73599%
P/E Ratio29.3816.42179%
Revenue280M705M40%
Total Cash34MN/A-
Total Debt13.2M16.5M80%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
FC
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
868
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
4096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6386
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (74) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RGP (100) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (96) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

FC's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RGP (86) in the null industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (91) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-0.88%
RGP - FC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.43%
GHC - FC
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
CASS - FC
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AZZ - FC
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
More

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
-2.43%
FC - RGP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
GHC - RGP
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
BCO - RGP
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
GPN - RGP
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
CASS - RGP
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
More