FC
Price
$19.18
Change
+$0.29 (+1.54%)
Updated
Sep 4, 02:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
238.8M
63 days until earnings call
PHLT
Price
$7.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4, 02:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
601.17M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FC vs PHLT

Header iconFC vs PHLT Comparison
Open Charts FC vs PHLTBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$19.18
Change+$0.29 (+1.54%)
Volume$100
Capitalization238.8M
Performant Healthcare
Price$7.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization601.17M
FC vs PHLT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. PHLT commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Buy and PHLT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $18.89 vs. PHLT: $7.62)
Brand notoriety: FC and PHLT are both not notable
FC represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while PHLT is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 107% vs. PHLT: 60%
Market capitalization -- FC: $238.8M vs. PHLT: $601.17M
FC [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $238.8M. PHLT’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $601.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.19B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PHLT is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PHLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FC and PHLT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FC (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -4.01% price change this week, while PHLT (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.54%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

PHLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (-1.21% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Services to the Health Industry (-0.68% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHLT($601M) has a higher market cap than FC($239M). PHLT YTD gains are higher at: 152.318 vs. FC (-49.734). FC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.6M vs. PHLT (6.92M). FC has more cash in the bank: 33.7M vs. PHLT (9.08M). FC has less debt than PHLT: FC (2.35M) vs PHLT (9.08M). FC has higher revenues than PHLT: FC (280M) vs PHLT (137M).
FCPHLTFC / PHLT
Capitalization239M601M40%
EBITDA25.6M6.92M370%
Gain YTD-49.734152.318-33%
P/E Ratio23.91N/A-
Revenue280M137M204%
Total Cash33.7M9.08M371%
Total Debt2.35M9.08M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs PHLT: Fundamental Ratings
FC
PHLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
5492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7682
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PHLT's Valuation (71) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FC (85). This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

PHLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (100). This means that PHLT’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHLT (92). This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHLT’s over the last 12 months.

PHLT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FC (65). This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PHLT (82). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to PHLT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCPHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIXT0.08N/A
+0.40%
Bioxytran, Inc.
FUPBY11.620.02
+0.13%
FUCHS SE
XFABF7.69N/A
N/A
X-FAB SILICON FOUNDRIES SE
MHGU11.50-0.06
-0.49%
Meritage Hospitality Group, Inc.
DKILF124.11-3.55
-2.78%
Daikin Industries Ltd.

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-3.57%
RGP - FC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CASS - FC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
GHC - FC
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
MSA - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

PHLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHLT has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHLT jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHLT
1D Price
Change %
PHLT100%
N/A
FC - PHLT
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.57%
LINC - PHLT
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.94%
FORR - PHLT
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
ICFI - PHLT
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
PRSU - PHLT
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More