FC
Price
$22.64
Change
-$0.06 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
520.87M
10 days until earnings call
NTIP
Price
$1.20
Change
-$0.04 (-3.23%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
48.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FC vs NTIP

Header iconFC vs NTIP Comparison
Open Charts FC vs NTIPBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$22.64
Change-$0.06 (-0.26%)
Volume$105.92K
Capitalization520.87M
Network-1 Technologies
Price$1.20
Change-$0.04 (-3.23%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization48.43M
FC vs NTIP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. NTIP commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a StrongBuy and NTIP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $22.64 vs. NTIP: $1.20)
Brand notoriety: FC and NTIP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 112% vs. NTIP: 16%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. NTIP: $48.43M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. NTIP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $48.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTIP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTIP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTIP is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTIP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NTIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than NTIP.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while NTIP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than NTIP($48.4M). FC has higher P/E ratio than NTIP: FC (29.38) vs NTIP (21.10). NTIP YTD gains are higher at: -6.331 vs. FC (-39.755). FC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9M vs. NTIP (-1.9M). NTIP has more cash in the bank: 45.5M vs. FC (34M). NTIP has less debt than FC: NTIP (23K) vs FC (13.2M). FC has higher revenues than NTIP: FC (280M) vs NTIP (2.6M).
FCNTIPFC / NTIP
Capitalization521M48.4M1,076%
EBITDA35.9M-1.9M-1,886%
Gain YTD-39.755-6.331628%
P/E Ratio29.3821.10139%
Revenue280M2.6M10,765%
Total Cash34M45.5M75%
Total Debt13.2M23K57,391%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs NTIP: Fundamental Ratings
FC
NTIP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
3991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8677
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
912
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTIP's Valuation (3) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (73) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NTIP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NTIP (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to NTIP’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTIP (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTIP’s over the last 12 months.

NTIP's Price Growth Rating (77) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FC (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NTIP’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

NTIP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (91) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NTIP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNTIP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBLAX14.60-0.09
-0.61%
Hartford Balanced Income A
AIFRX25.69-0.19
-0.73%
abrdn Global Infrastructure Instl
KCGIX21.26-0.25
-1.16%
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
MWECX37.11-0.61
-1.62%
MFS Global Equity C
PARNX56.22-1.07
-1.87%
Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Investor

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-0.26%
RGP - FC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
GHC - FC
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
CASS - FC
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.27%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
AZZ - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More

NTIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTIP and SRRPF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTIP and SRRPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTIP
1D Price
Change %
NTIP100%
-3.23%
SRRPF - NTIP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKIL - NTIP
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.10%
FC - NTIP
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
NL - NTIP
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.51%
TISI - NTIP
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More