FC
Price
$36.72
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
47 days until earnings call
NTIP
Price
$1.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

FC vs NTIP

Header iconFC vs NTIP Comparison
Open Charts FC vs NTIPBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$36.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$90.04K
CapitalizationN/A
Network-1 Technologies
Price$1.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$369.45K
CapitalizationN/A
FC vs NTIP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NTIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. NTIP commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a StrongSell and NTIP is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (FC: $36.72 vs. NTIP: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: FC and NTIP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 203% vs. NTIP: 856%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. NTIP: $48.43M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. NTIP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $48.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTIP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTIP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTIP is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTIP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NTIP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTIP is a better buy in the short-term than FC.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -2.21% price change this week, while NTIP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +4.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.

NTIP is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.54% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than NTIP($48.4M). FC has higher P/E ratio than NTIP: FC (29.38) vs NTIP (21.10). FC YTD gains are higher at: -15.644 vs. NTIP (-34.603). FC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9M vs. NTIP (-1.9M). NTIP has more cash in the bank: 45.5M vs. FC (34M). NTIP has less debt than FC: NTIP (23K) vs FC (13.2M). FC has higher revenues than NTIP: FC (280M) vs NTIP (2.6M).
FCNTIPFC / NTIP
Capitalization521M48.4M1,076%
EBITDA35.9M-1.9M-1,886%
Gain YTD-15.644-34.60345%
P/E Ratio29.3821.10139%
Revenue280M2.6M10,765%
Total Cash34M45.5M75%
Total Debt13.2M23K57,391%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs NTIP: Fundamental Ratings
FC
NTIP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1129
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
4390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
894
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTIP's Valuation (3) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NTIP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NTIP (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to NTIP’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (43) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTIP (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTIP’s over the last 12 months.

FC's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NTIP (63) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to NTIP’s over the last 12 months.

NTIP's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NTIP’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNTIP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NTIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with PFMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then PFMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-3.04%
PFMT - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
LINC - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.11%
ALLE - FC
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
FORR - FC
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
VVI - FC
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.86%
More

NTIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTIP and ARC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTIP and ARC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTIP
1D Price
Change %
NTIP100%
+2.27%
ARC - NTIP
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRPF - NTIP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKIL - NTIP
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.48%
FC - NTIP
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.04%
TISI - NTIP
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.62%
More