FC
Price
$33.46
Change
-$0.22 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jan 22, 12:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
520.87M
63 days until earnings call
LINC
Price
$15.87
Change
-$0.33 (-2.04%)
Updated
Jan 22, 01:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
325.22M
40 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FC vs LINC

Header iconFC vs LINC Comparison
Open Charts FC vs LINCBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$33.46
Change-$0.22 (-0.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization520.87M
Lincoln Educational Services
Price$15.87
Change-$0.33 (-2.04%)
Volume$100
Capitalization325.22M
FC vs LINC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. LINC commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and LINC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $33.68 vs. LINC: $16.20)
Brand notoriety: FC and LINC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 110% vs. LINC: 45%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. LINC: $325.22M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. LINC’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $325.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLINC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LINC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LINC is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LINC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LINC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than LINC.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +6.79% price change this week, while LINC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +7.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

LINC is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.82% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than LINC($325M). FC has higher P/E ratio than LINC: FC (29.38) vs LINC (12.05). LINC YTD gains are higher at: 2.402 vs. FC (-10.378). LINC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.6M vs. FC (35.9M). LINC has more cash in the bank: 76M vs. FC (34M). FC has less debt than LINC: FC (13.2M) vs LINC (117M). LINC has higher revenues than FC: LINC (378M) vs FC (280M).
FCLINCFC / LINC
Capitalization521M325M160%
EBITDA35.9M42.6M84%
Gain YTD-10.3782.402-432%
P/E Ratio29.3812.05244%
Revenue280M378M74%
Total Cash34M76M45%
Total Debt13.2M117M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs LINC: Fundamental Ratings
FC
LINC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
96
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1003
SMR RATING
1..100
4281
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
853
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FC's Valuation (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (85). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (100). This means that LINC’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (42) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LINC (81). This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LINC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (83). This means that LINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (85). This means that LINC’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCLINC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with LINC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then LINC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
+1.57%
LINC - FC
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
+5.19%
FORR - FC
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
ALLE - FC
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
HURN - FC
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More

LINC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LINC
1D Price
Change %
LINC100%
+2.02%
FC - LINC
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
UTI - LINC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
LOPE - LINC
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
ATGE - LINC
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
APEI - LINC
38%
Loosely correlated
+4.42%
More