FC
Price
$36.41
Change
-$0.38 (-1.03%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
16 days until earnings call
LINC
Price
$15.45
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FC vs LINC

Header iconFC vs LINC Comparison
Open Charts FC vs LINCBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$36.41
Change-$0.38 (-1.03%)
Volume$191.03K
CapitalizationN/A
Lincoln Educational Services
Price$15.45
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Volume$319.55K
CapitalizationN/A
FC vs LINC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. LINC commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and LINC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (FC: $36.41 vs. LINC: $15.45)
Brand notoriety: FC and LINC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 315% vs. LINC: 269%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. LINC: $325.22M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. LINC’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $325.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLINC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LINC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LINC is a better buy in the long-term than FC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LINC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LINC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than LINC.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while LINC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

LINC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.88% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than LINC($325M). FC has higher P/E ratio than LINC: FC (29.38) vs LINC (12.05). LINC YTD gains are higher at: 53.884 vs. FC (-16.357). LINC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.6M vs. FC (35.9M). LINC has more cash in the bank: 76M vs. FC (34M). FC has less debt than LINC: FC (13.2M) vs LINC (117M). LINC has higher revenues than FC: LINC (378M) vs FC (280M).
FCLINCFC / LINC
Capitalization521M325M160%
EBITDA35.9M42.6M84%
Gain YTD-16.35753.884-30%
P/E Ratio29.3812.05244%
Revenue280M378M74%
Total Cash34M76M45%
Total Debt13.2M117M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs LINC: Fundamental Ratings
FC
LINC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1003
SMR RATING
1..100
4281
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
893
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FC's Valuation (82) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (84). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (100). This means that LINC’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (42) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LINC (81). This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LINC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FC (57). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (89). This means that LINC’s stock grew significantly faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCLINC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with LINC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then LINC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-1.03%
LINC - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
VVI - FC
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
ALLE - FC
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
FORR - FC
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More

LINC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LINC
1D Price
Change %
LINC100%
-0.06%
FC - LINC
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
UTI - LINC
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
LOPE - LINC
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
ATGE - LINC
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
UDMY - LINC
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
More