FC
Price
$15.09
Change
-$0.06 (-0.40%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
183.43M
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KLC
Price
$4.04
Change
-$0.96 (-19.20%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
478.01M
125 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FC vs KLC

Header iconFC vs KLC Comparison
Open Charts FC vs KLCBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$15.09
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
Volume$143.39K
Capitalization183.43M
KinderCare Learning Companies
Price$4.04
Change-$0.96 (-19.20%)
Volume$4.32M
Capitalization478.01M
FC vs KLC Comparison Chart in %
FC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. KLC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and KLC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $15.09 vs. KLC: $4.04)
Brand notoriety: FC and KLC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 130% vs. KLC: 497%
Market capitalization -- FC: $183.43M vs. KLC: $478.01M
FC [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $183.43M. KLC’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $478.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKLC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KLC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the long-term than KLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KLC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KLC is a better buy in the short-term than FC.

Price Growth

FC (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -5.09% price change this week, while KLC (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -23.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Jan 01, 2026.

KLC is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (-2.17% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLC($478M) has a higher market cap than FC($183M). FC has higher P/E ratio than KLC: FC (62.88) vs KLC (28.32). FC YTD gains are higher at: -59.686 vs. KLC (-71.910). KLC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 214M vs. FC (25.6M). KLC has more cash in the bank: 119M vs. FC (33.7M). FC has less debt than KLC: FC (2.35M) vs KLC (2.47B). KLC has higher revenues than FC: KLC (2.69B) vs FC (280M).
FCKLCFC / KLC
Capitalization183M478M38%
EBITDA25.6M214M12%
Gain YTD-59.686-71.91083%
P/E Ratio62.8828.32222%
Revenue280M2.69B10%
Total Cash33.7M119M28%
Total Debt2.35M2.47B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC: Fundamental Ratings
FC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCKLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHYCY3.00N/A
N/A
Chiyoda Corp.
NMGX0.39N/A
N/A
NANO MAGIC INC.
MRTI59.74N/A
N/A
Maxus Realty Trust, Inc.
AVIFY9.55-0.36
-3.63%
Advanced Info Service Public Co., Ltd.
TWODY13.36-0.52
-3.75%
Taylor Wimpey Plc

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-1.50%
RGP - FC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
CASS - FC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
GHC - FC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
AZZ - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
MSA - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More

KLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLC and GHC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLC and GHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLC
1D Price
Change %
KLC100%
-2.15%
GHC - KLC
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
FC - KLC
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
LINC - KLC
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
LOPE - KLC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
ATGE - KLC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More