FC
Price
$36.41
Change
-$0.38 (-1.03%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
16 days until earnings call
FORR
Price
$15.30
Change
-$0.03 (-0.20%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FC vs FORR

Header iconFC vs FORR Comparison
Open Charts FC vs FORRBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$36.41
Change-$0.38 (-1.03%)
Volume$191.03K
CapitalizationN/A
Forrester Research
Price$15.30
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
Volume$182.24K
CapitalizationN/A
FC vs FORR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FC vs. FORR commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and FORR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (FC: $36.41 vs. FORR: $15.30)
Brand notoriety: FC and FORR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 315% vs. FORR: 253%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M vs. FORR: $418.13M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. FORR’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $418.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFORR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FORR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the long-term than FORR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FORR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FORR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than FORR.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while FORR (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -5.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

FORR is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.01% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than FORR($418M). FORR has higher P/E ratio than FC: FORR (130.38) vs FC (29.38). FC YTD gains are higher at: -16.357 vs. FORR (-42.932). FORR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.4M vs. FC (35.9M). FORR has more cash in the bank: 124M vs. FC (34M). FC has less debt than FORR: FC (13.2M) vs FORR (86.9M). FORR has higher revenues than FC: FORR (481M) vs FC (280M).
FCFORRFC / FORR
Capitalization521M418M125%
EBITDA35.9M41.4M87%
Gain YTD-16.357-42.93238%
P/E Ratio29.38130.3823%
Revenue280M481M58%
Total Cash34M124M27%
Total Debt13.2M86.9M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs FORR: Fundamental Ratings
FC
FORR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5781
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FC's Valuation (82) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FORR (91). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.

FC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FORR (100). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (42) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FORR (90). This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FORR’s over the last 12 months.

FC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FORR (81). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.

FORR's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FC (89). This means that FORR’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFORR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

FC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with LINC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then LINC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FC
1D Price
Change %
FC100%
-1.03%
LINC - FC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
PHLT - FC
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
VVI - FC
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
ALLE - FC
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
FORR - FC
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More

FORR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORR has been loosely correlated with CASS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORR jumps, then CASS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORR
1D Price
Change %
FORR100%
-0.20%
CASS - FORR
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
FC - FORR
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
PHLT - FORR
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
VVI - FORR
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
REZI - FORR
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More