FC vs FORR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a Hold and FORR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFORR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FORR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FORR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- FORR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -27.01% price change this week, while FORR (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -3.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
FC is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.
FORR is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.75% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| FC | FORR | FC / FORR | |
| Capitalization | 521M | 418M | 125% |
| EBITDA | 35.9M | 41.4M | 87% |
| Gain YTD | -45.423 | -41.161 | 110% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.38 | 130.38 | 23% |
| Revenue | 280M | 481M | 58% |
| Total Cash | 34M | 124M | 27% |
| Total Debt | 13.2M | 86.9M | 15% |
FC | FORR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FC's Valuation (76) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FORR (90). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.
FC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FORR (100). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.
FC's SMR Rating (38) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FORR (91). This means that FC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FORR’s over the last 12 months.
FC's Price Growth Rating (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FORR (91). This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.
FORR's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FC (86). This means that FORR’s stock grew similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.
| FC | FORR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 71% | 9 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | 13 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 63% |
FC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with PHLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then PHLT could also see price increases.
FORR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORR has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORR jumps, then FC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORR | 100% | -2.43% | ||
| FC - FORR | 38% Loosely correlated | -26.46% | ||
| GHC - FORR | 37% Loosely correlated | -5.81% | ||
| RGP - FORR | 36% Loosely correlated | -19.76% | ||
| PHLT - FORR | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.01% | ||
| LOPE - FORR | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||