Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs VGHCX
FBTDX vs VGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. VGHCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Buy and VGHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGHCX has more cash in the bank: 36.1B vs. FBTDX (915M). VGHCX pays higher dividends than FBTDX: VGHCX (0.84) vs FBTDX (0.00). FBTDX was incepted earlier than VGHCX: FBTDX (12 years) vs VGHCX (41 years). FBTDX (1.78) is less costly to investors than VGHCX (0.37). VGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBTDX (21.87). FBTDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VGHCX: FBTDX (1000) vs VGHCX (3000). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. VGHCX (-14.24). VGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -12.62 vs. FBTDX (-15.70).
| FBTDX | VGHCX | FBTDX / VGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.37 | 478% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.37 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.223 | 5.253 | 632% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 915M | 36.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.58 | -14.24 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.19 | -3.37 | -1,550% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.70 | -12.62 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.32 | -11.36 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement