Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs VGHCX
FBTDX vs VGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. VGHCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Buy and VGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGHCX has more cash in the bank: 37.5B vs. FBTDX (959M). VGHCX pays higher dividends than FBTDX: VGHCX (0.80) vs FBTDX (0.00). FBTDX was incepted earlier than VGHCX: FBTDX (12 years) vs VGHCX (42 years). FBTDX (1.78) is less costly to investors than VGHCX (0.37). VGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FBTDX (21.87). FBTDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VGHCX: FBTDX (1000) vs VGHCX (3000). FBTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.02 vs. VGHCX (-4.51). VGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.43 vs. FBTDX (-12.19).
| FBTDX | VGHCX | FBTDX / VGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.37 | 478% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.37 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.923 | 11.597 | 344% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 959M | 37.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.02 | -4.51 | -266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.61 | -3.15 | -1,702% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.19 | -9.43 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.03 | -7.66 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement