Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs PRHSX
FBTCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and PRHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FBTCX (1.3B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than PRHSX: FBTCX (2.88) vs PRHSX (0.01). FBTCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FBTCX (25 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PRHSX (0.80). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. PRHSX (52.40). FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FBTCX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.29 vs. PRHSX (-19.96). PRHSX return over 5 years is better than : -13.14 vs. FBTCX (-15.75).
| FBTCX | PRHSX | FBTCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.037 | -1.999 | -152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 11.2B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 0.01 | 32,264% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.29 | -19.96 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.41 | -12.58 | -218% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.75 | -13.14 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.90 | -7.05 | 282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement