Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs PRHSX
FBTCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and PRHSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. FBTCX (1.93B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than PRHSX: FBTCX (1.92) vs PRHSX (0.01). FBTCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FBTCX (25 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PRHSX (0.80). PRHSX (52.40) and FBTCX (51.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FBTCX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.39 vs. PRHSX (4.03). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.04 vs. PRHSX (-15.57).
| FBTCX | PRHSX | FBTCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.715 | 6.237 | 685% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 12.3B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.01 | 26,009% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.39 | 4.03 | 854% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | -5.35 | -1,095% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.04 | -15.57 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.01 | 21.23 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement