Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs PRHSX
FBTCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and PRHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. FBTCX (1.3B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than PRHSX: FBTCX (2.88) vs PRHSX (0.01). FBTCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FBTCX (25 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PRHSX (0.80). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. PRHSX (52.40). FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FBTCX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.19 vs. PRHSX (-17.24). PRHSX return over 5 years is better than : -12.38 vs. FBTCX (-22.16).
| FBTCX | PRHSX | FBTCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.566 | -2.741 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 11.3B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 0.01 | 32,264% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.19 | -17.24 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.78 | -11.08 | -224% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.16 | -12.38 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.53 | -5.50 | 391% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement