Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs PRHSX
FBTCX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. PRHSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a StrongBuy and PRHSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FBTCX (1.87B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than PRHSX: FBTCX (1.32) vs PRHSX (0.12). FBTCX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FBTCX (25 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PRHSX (0.80). PRHSX (52.40) and FBTCX (51.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FBTCX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.97 vs. PRHSX (-2.05). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.76 vs. PRHSX (-20.50).
| FBTCX | PRHSX | FBTCX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.717 | -1.353 | -201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 12.1B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.12 | 1,138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.97 | -2.05 | -2,000% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.49 | -8.29 | -669% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.76 | -20.50 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.24 | 42.94 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement