Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs JNGLX
FBTCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. FBTCX (1.93B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FBTCX (1.92) vs JNGLX (0.28). FBTCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FBTCX (25 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FBTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FBTCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.89 vs. JNGLX (8.74). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.44 vs. FBTCX (4.86).
| FBTCX | JNGLX | FBTCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.80 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.240 | 22.964 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 4.95B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.28 | 685% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.89 | 8.74 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.97 | 22.50 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.86 | 16.44 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.04 | 53.51 | 67% |