Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. FBTCX (1.93B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (1.92) vs FSPHX (0.01). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (25 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.39 vs. FSPHX (4.50). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.04 vs. FSPHX (-2.50).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.715 | 13.688 | 312% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 6.67B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.01 | 13,049% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.39 | 4.50 | 764% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 12.88 | 454% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.04 | -2.50 | -322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.01 | 49.35 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement