Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. FBTCX (1.74B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (2.12) vs FSPHX (0.02). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (25 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.39 vs. FSPHX (-5.87). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.51 vs. FSPHX (-12.12).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.694 | 9.761 | 355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 6.22B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 0.02 | 13,366% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.39 | -5.87 | -245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.04 | 8.94 | 582% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.51 | -12.12 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.67 | 41.27 | 77% |