Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTCX vs FSPHX
FBTCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTCX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. FBTCX (1.87B). FBTCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBTCX (1.32) vs FSPHX (0.43). FBTCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTCX (25 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBTCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FBTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FBTCX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.97 vs. FSPHX (0.29). FBTCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.76 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FBTCX | FSPHX | FBTCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.63 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.717 | 0.809 | 336% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 6.28B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.43 | 309% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.97 | 0.29 | 14,229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.49 | 1.47 | 3,771% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.76 | -13.13 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.24 | 62.61 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement