Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs RYCFX
FBTAX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. RYCFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a StrongBuy and RYCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. RYCFX (137M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FBTAX (1.17) vs RYCFX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FBTAX (25 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FBTAX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.12 vs. RYCFX (4.56). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.38 vs. RYCFX (-43.73).
| FBTAX | RYCFX | FBTAX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.38 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.751 | 3.132 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 137M | 1,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.12 | 4.56 | 923% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.53 | -9.30 | -651% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.38 | -43.73 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.13 | -21.73 | -562% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement