Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs RYCFX
FBTAX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. RYCFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and RYCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. RYCFX (84.5M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FBTAX (3.05) vs RYCFX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FBTAX (24 years) vs RYCFX (24 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RYCFX (51.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FBTAX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.14 vs. RYCFX (-20.70). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.77 vs. RYCFX (-40.05).
| FBTAX | RYCFX | FBTAX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.40 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.573 | -0.591 | 435% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 84.5M | 1,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -20.70 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.29 | -2.98 | -1,520% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.77 | -40.05 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.12 | -52.60 | 12% |