Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCOX
FBTAX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCOX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. LHCOX (7.64M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCOX: FBTAX (2.59) vs LHCOX (0.55). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCOX (6 years). LHCOX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. LHCOX (-3.05). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.85 vs. LHCOX (3.69).
| FBTAX | LHCOX | FBTAX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.68 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.339 | 1.545 | 1,187% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 7.64M | 19,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 0.55 | 468% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | -3.05 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.90 | 24.53 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.85 | 3.69 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.27 | N/A | - |