Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCOX
FBTAX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCOX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. LHCOX (9.01M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCOX: FBTAX (1.95) vs LHCOX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCOX (6 years). LHCOX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.01 vs. LHCOX (16.89). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 16.99 vs. FBTAX (15.47).
| FBTAX | LHCOX | FBTAX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.68 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.99 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.537 | 19.361 | 209% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 9.01M | 21,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.01 | 16.89 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.98 | 34.86 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | 16.99 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement