Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCIX
FBTAX vs LHCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCIX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. LHCIX (7.31M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCIX: FBTAX (2.95) vs LHCIX (0.59). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCIX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCIX (6 years). LHCIX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCIX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCIX (1000000). LHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.41 vs. FBTAX (-5.68). LHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.07 vs. FBTAX (-13.75).
| FBTAX | LHCIX | FBTAX / LHCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.78 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 3.09 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.213 | -4.186 | 29% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 7.31M | 17,736% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 0.59 | 502% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.68 | -4.41 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.75 | 11.02 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.75 | 5.07 | -271% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.19 | N/A | - |