Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCCX
FBTAX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. LHCCX (7.31M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FBTAX (2.95) vs LHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (73.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.39 vs. FBTAX (-5.68). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.23 vs. FBTAX (-13.75).
| FBTAX | LHCCX | FBTAX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 4.09 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.213 | -4.674 | 26% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 7.31M | 17,736% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.68 | -5.39 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.75 | 7.87 | 365% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.75 | -0.23 | 6,043% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.19 | N/A | - |