Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCCX
FBTAX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and LHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. LHCCX (9.01M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FBTAX (1.95) vs LHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCCX (6 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.16 vs. LHCCX (16.02). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.12 vs. LHCCX (11.00).
| FBTAX | LHCCX | FBTAX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 4.09 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.771 | 18.478 | 237% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 9.01M | 21,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.16 | 16.02 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.73 | 30.70 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.12 | 11.00 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement