Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs LHCCX
FBTAX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. LHCCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a StrongBuy and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBTAX has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. LHCCX (8.77M). FBTAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FBTAX (1.17) vs LHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FBTAX (25 years) vs LHCCX (7 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FBTAX (51.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FBTAX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.12 vs. LHCCX (10.86). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.38 vs. LHCCX (2.07).
| FBTAX | LHCCX | FBTAX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 4.09 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.751 | -1.117 | -246% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 8.77M | 21,277% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.12 | 10.86 | 388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.53 | 25.01 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.38 | 2.07 | 599% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement