Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs JFNAX
FBTAX vs JFNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. JFNAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Buy and JFNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFNAX has more cash in the bank: 4.35B vs. FBTAX (1.28B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than JFNAX: FBTAX (3.05) vs JFNAX (0.13). FBTAX was incepted earlier than JFNAX: FBTAX (24 years) vs JFNAX (16 years). JFNAX (0.98) and FBTAX (0.96) have similar cost to investors . FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. JFNAX (35.00). FBTAX (6%) and JFNAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNAX: FBTAX (0) vs JFNAX (2500). FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.14 vs. JFNAX (-12.25). JFNAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.98 vs. FBTAX (-8.77).
| FBTAX | JFNAX | FBTAX / JFNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.98 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.98 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.573 | -1.766 | 146% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 4.35B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 0.13 | 2,309% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.14 | -12.25 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.29 | 19.79 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.77 | 11.98 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.12 | 9.32 | -66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement