Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTAX vs FHCCX
FBTAX vs FHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. FHCCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and FHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHCCX has more cash in the bank: 3.28B vs. FBTAX (1.61B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than FHCCX: FBTAX (2.34) vs FHCCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than FHCCX: FBTAX (25 years) vs FHCCX (28 years). FHCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FHCCX (52.00) and FBTAX (51.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBTAX (0) and FHCCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.06 vs. FHCCX (-16.41). FBTAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.86 vs. FHCCX (-14.82).
| FBTAX | FHCCX | FBTAX / FHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.68 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.68 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.577 | 7.183 | 426% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 3.28B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | -16.41 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.36 | 2.68 | 2,104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.86 | -14.82 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.45 | 42.64 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement