Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBSIX vs JVMCX
FBSIX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FBSIX vs JVMCX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value R6
Price$38.82
Change-$0.19 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets773.07M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.41
Change-$0.21 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59B
FBSIX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBSIX vs. JVMCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSIX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. FBSIX (773M). FBSIX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FBSIX (1.46) vs JVMCX (0.00). FBSIX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FBSIX (12 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FBSIX (0.59). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FBSIX (37.84). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBSIX: JVMCX (1000) vs FBSIX (1000000). FBSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.83 vs. JVMCX (-0.87). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.38 vs. FBSIX (38.43).
| FBSIX | JVMCX | FBSIX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.87 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.88 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.385 | 8.340 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 773M | 23.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.83 | -0.87 | -326% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.68 | 8.57 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.43 | 43.38 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.15 | 32.89 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement