FBSI
Price
$26.21
Change
+$0.09 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
59.77M
5 days until earnings call
RGNLF
Price
$8.78
Change
-$1.07 (-10.86%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBSI vs RGNLF

Header iconFBSI vs RGNLF Comparison
Open Charts FBSI vs RGNLFBanner chart's image
First Bancshares
Price$26.21
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
Volume$200
Capitalization59.77M
REGIONAL S A
Price$8.78
Change-$1.07 (-10.86%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization2.55B
FBSI vs RGNLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBSI vs. RGNLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSI is a StrongBuy and RGNLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FBSI: $26.21 vs. RGNLF: $8.78)
Brand notoriety: FBSI and RGNLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBSI: 60% vs. RGNLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FBSI: $59.77M vs. RGNLF: $2.55B
FBSI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $59.77M. RGNLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBSI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGNLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGNLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBSI is a better buy in the long-term than RGNLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBSI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FBSI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FBSI (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RGNLF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBSI is expected to report earnings on Jul 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNLF($2.55B) has a higher market cap than FBSI($59.8M). RGNLF has higher P/E ratio than FBSI: RGNLF (14.25) vs FBSI (9.91). FBSI YTD gains are higher at: 6.565 vs. RGNLF (0.000). FBSI has less debt than RGNLF: FBSI (1.5M) vs RGNLF (8.31B). RGNLF has higher revenues than FBSI: RGNLF (14.9B) vs FBSI (20.6M).
FBSIRGNLFFBSI / RGNLF
Capitalization59.8M2.55B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.5650.000-
P/E Ratio9.9114.2570%
Revenue20.6M14.9B0%
Total Cash55.6MN/A-
Total Debt1.5M8.31B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBSI vs RGNLF: Fundamental Ratings
FBSI
RGNLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
533
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5773
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4373
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBSI's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as RGNLF (86). This means that FBSI’s stock grew similarly to RGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGNLF (100). This means that FBSI’s stock grew significantly faster than RGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

RGNLF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBSI (53). This means that RGNLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as RGNLF (73). This means that FBSI’s stock grew similarly to RGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as RGNLF (73). This means that FBSI’s stock grew similarly to RGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBSIRGNLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTEYX86.941.30
+1.52%
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Y
MIOFX30.050.27
+0.91%
Marsico International Opportunities
GCTCX44.650.39
+0.88%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq C
CWIAX71.270.45
+0.64%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc 529A
DLDRX44.74-0.10
-0.22%
BNY Mellon Natural Resources I

FBSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSI and MFDB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSI and MFDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSI
1D Price
Change %
FBSI100%
N/A
MFDB - FBSI
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - FBSI
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGNLF - FBSI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSVB - FBSI
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
CZBT - FBSI
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RGNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGNLF has been loosely correlated with KGTFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGNLF jumps, then KGTFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGNLF
1D Price
Change %
RGNLF100%
N/A
KGTFF - RGNLF
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BPIRF - RGNLF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NEFB - RGNLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSI - RGNLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHYY - RGNLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More