FBSI
Price
$31.00
Change
+$3.04 (+10.87%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
72.58M
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RGNLF
Price
$8.78
Change
-$1.07 (-10.86%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBSI vs RGNLF

Header iconFBSI vs RGNLF Comparison
Open Charts FBSI vs RGNLFBanner chart's image
First Bancshares
Price$31.00
Change+$3.04 (+10.87%)
Volume$500
Capitalization72.58M
REGIONAL S A
Price$8.78
Change-$1.07 (-10.86%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization2.95B
FBSI vs RGNLF Comparison Chart in %
FBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBSI vs. RGNLF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSI is a Hold and RGNLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FBSI: $31.00 vs. RGNLF: $8.78)
Brand notoriety: FBSI and RGNLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBSI: 119% vs. RGNLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FBSI: $72.58M vs. RGNLF: $2.95B
FBSI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $72.58M. RGNLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBSI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGNLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBSI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGNLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBSI is a better buy in the long-term than RGNLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBSI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FBSI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FBSI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.66% price change this week, while RGNLF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBSI is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNLF($2.95B) has a higher market cap than FBSI($72.6M). FBSI has higher P/E ratio than RGNLF: FBSI (11.70) vs RGNLF (8.48). RGNLF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. FBSI (-7.656). FBSI has less debt than RGNLF: FBSI (11M) vs RGNLF (9.82B). RGNLF has higher revenues than FBSI: RGNLF (20B) vs FBSI (23M).
FBSIRGNLFFBSI / RGNLF
Capitalization72.6M2.95B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.6560.000-
P/E Ratio11.708.48138%
Revenue23M20B0%
Total Cash9.07MN/A-
Total Debt11M9.82B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBSI vs RGNLF: Fundamental Ratings
FBSI
RGNLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1943
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
564
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4571
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2667
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1352

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGNLF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBSI (73). This means that RGNLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGNLF (100). This means that FBSI’s stock grew significantly faster than RGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

RGNLF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBSI (56). This means that RGNLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RGNLF (71). This means that FBSI’s stock grew similarly to RGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGNLF (67). This means that FBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBSIRGNLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBHRX16.370.14
+0.86%
Neuberger Equity Income R3
BRXBX18.480.12
+0.65%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq B
FOBAX20.25-0.07
-0.34%
Tributary Balanced Instl
MGRTX48.09-0.31
-0.64%
MFS International Growth R3
VILSX30.79-0.90
-2.84%
Value Line Select Growth Institutional

FBSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSI and MFDB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSI and MFDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSI
1D Price
Change %
FBSI100%
-8.80%
MFDB - FBSI
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - FBSI
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOTB - FBSI
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
KNFSF - FBSI
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGNLF - FBSI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RGNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGNLF and CCFN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGNLF and CCFN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGNLF
1D Price
Change %
RGNLF100%
N/A
CCFN - RGNLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSI - RGNLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.80%
CBTN - RGNLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNEB - RGNLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
GNTY - RGNLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More