FBSI
Price
$27.25
Change
-$0.75 (-2.68%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
63.82M
13 days until earnings call
MFDB
Price
$2.45
Change
+$0.05 (+2.08%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBSI vs MFDB

Header iconFBSI vs MFDB Comparison
Open Charts FBSI vs MFDBBanner chart's image
First Bancshares
Price$27.25
Change-$0.75 (-2.68%)
Volume$200
Capitalization63.82M
Mutual Federal Ban
Price$2.45
Change+$0.05 (+2.08%)
Volume$200
Capitalization8.17M
FBSI vs MFDB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBSI vs. MFDB commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSI is a Hold and MFDB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FBSI: $27.25 vs. MFDB: $2.45)
Brand notoriety: FBSI and MFDB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBSI: 40% vs. MFDB: 4%
Market capitalization -- FBSI: $63.82M vs. MFDB: $8.17M
FBSI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $63.82M. MFDB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBSI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFDB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFDB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBSI is a better buy in the long-term than MFDB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBSI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFDB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBSI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFDB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFDB is a better buy in the short-term than FBSI.

Price Growth

FBSI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while MFDB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBSI is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBSI($63.8M) has a higher market cap than MFDB($8.17M). FBSI YTD gains are higher at: 10.793 vs. MFDB (-18.333). MFDB has less debt than FBSI: MFDB (5M) vs FBSI (11M).
FBSIMFDBFBSI / MFDB
Capitalization63.8M8.17M781%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.793-18.333-59%
P/E Ratio10.28N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash9.07MN/A-
Total Debt11M5M220%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBSI vs MFDB: Fundamental Ratings
FBSI
MFDB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9699
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
56100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
446

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFDB's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBSI (75). This means that MFDB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBSI’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFDB (100). This means that FBSI’s stock grew significantly faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFDB (100). This means that FBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MFDB (60). This means that FBSI’s stock grew similarly to MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

FBSI's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFDB (100). This means that FBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBSIMFDB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LNSTY28.000.13
+0.47%
London Stock Exchange Group plc
NGXLF0.05N/A
N/A
NGX LTD.
CWGL5.24N/A
N/A
Crimson Wine Group Ltd.
KGFHF3.56N/A
N/A
Kingfisher plc
CSPHF1.00N/A
N/A
CSTONE PHARMACEUTICALS

FBSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSI and MFDB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSI and MFDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSI
1D Price
Change %
FBSI100%
N/A
MFDB - FBSI
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBJF - FBSI
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGNLF - FBSI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSVB - FBSI
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CZBT - FBSI
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFDB has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFDB jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFDB
1D Price
Change %
MFDB100%
N/A
OTPBF - MFDB
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSVB - MFDB
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
WOBK - MFDB
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBSI - MFDB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRGG - MFDB
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
More