FBSFF
Price
$15.61
Change
-$2.89 (-15.62%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
222.5M
SWVL
Price
$5.00
Change
-$0.30 (-5.66%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
80.48M
Ad is loading...

FBSFF vs SWVL

Header iconFBSFF vs SWVL Comparison
Open Charts FBSFF vs SWVLBanner chart's image
Fabasoft AG
Price$15.61
Change-$2.89 (-15.62%)
Volume$200
Capitalization222.5M
Swvl Holdings
Price$5.00
Change-$0.30 (-5.66%)
Volume$40.95K
Capitalization80.48M
FBSFF vs SWVL Comparison Chart
Loading...
SWVL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBSFF vs. SWVL commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSFF is a Hold and SWVL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FBSFF: $15.61 vs. SWVL: $5.00)
Brand notoriety: FBSFF and SWVL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBSFF: 22% vs. SWVL: 84%
Market capitalization -- FBSFF: $222.5M vs. SWVL: $80.48M
FBSFF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $222.5M. SWVL’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $80.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBSFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWVL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWVL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FBSFF and SWVL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SWVL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SWVL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FBSFF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWVL (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

SWVL is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBSFF($222M) has a higher market cap than SWVL($80.5M). FBSFF has higher P/E ratio than SWVL: FBSFF (31.65) vs SWVL (1.02). FBSFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SWVL (-21.666). FBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.4M vs. SWVL (-118.47M). FBSFF has more cash in the bank: 26.6M vs. SWVL (19.3M). SWVL has less debt than FBSFF: SWVL (6.18M) vs FBSFF (7.49M). FBSFF (69.2M) and SWVL (66.2M) have equivalent revenues.
FBSFFSWVLFBSFF / SWVL
Capitalization222M80.5M276%
EBITDA17.4M-118.47M-15%
Gain YTD0.000-21.666-
P/E Ratio31.651.023,114%
Revenue69.2M66.2M105%
Total Cash26.6M19.3M138%
Total Debt7.49M6.18M121%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWVL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SWVL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

FBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSFF and SWVL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSFF and SWVL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSFF
1D Price
Change %
FBSFF100%
N/A
SWVL - FBSFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
EBYH - FBSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBLG - FBSFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
LKCO - FBSFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.52%
EMCHF - FBSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWVL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWVL and FBSFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWVL and FBSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWVL
1D Price
Change %
SWVL100%
-5.66%
FBSFF - SWVL
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIERF - SWVL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDFS - SWVL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
LYT - SWVL
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.80%
TRAK - SWVL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More