FBSFF
Price
$18.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
203.12M
FMZNF
Price
$0.44
Change
+$0.14 (+46.67%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
619.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBSFF vs FMZNF

Header iconFBSFF vs FMZNF Comparison
Open Charts FBSFF vs FMZNFBanner chart's image
Fabasoft AG
Price$18.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$100
Capitalization203.12M
QORIA
Price$0.44
Change+$0.14 (+46.67%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization619.21M
FBSFF vs FMZNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBSFF vs. FMZNF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSFF is a Hold and FMZNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FBSFF: $18.00 vs. FMZNF: $0.44)
Brand notoriety: FBSFF and FMZNF are both not notable
FBSFF represents the Packaged Software, while FMZNF is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBSFF: 100% vs. FMZNF: 35%
Market capitalization -- FBSFF: $203.12M vs. FMZNF: $615.9M
FBSFF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $203.12M. FMZNF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $615.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBSFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMZNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FBSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMZNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBSFF is a better buy in the long-term than FMZNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMZNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FMZNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

FBSFF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FMZNF (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.84%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-0.19% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMZNF($619M) has a higher market cap than FBSFF($203M). FMZNF YTD gains are higher at: 30.370 vs. FBSFF (15.311). FBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.6M vs. FMZNF (4.61M). FMZNF has higher revenues than FBSFF: FMZNF (106M) vs FBSFF (87.6M).
FBSFFFMZNFFBSFF / FMZNF
Capitalization203M619M33%
EBITDA21.6M4.61M469%
Gain YTD15.31130.37050%
P/E Ratio18.35N/A-
Revenue87.6M106M83%
Total Cash32.3MN/A-
Total Debt5.88MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBSFF vs FMZNF: Fundamental Ratings
FBSFF
FMZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4345
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
3496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBSFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as FMZNF (43). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew similarly to FMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

FMZNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as FBSFF (100). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew similarly to FBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

FBSFF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMZNF (96). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

FMZNF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FBSFF (55). This means that FMZNF’s stock grew similarly to FBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

FBSFF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMZNF (100). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBSFFFMZNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSVIX29.440.31
+1.06%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value I
GBCAX18.840.18
+0.96%
Gabelli Dividend Growth A
TADFX8.520.06
+0.71%
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Inc R6
MITJX36.790.21
+0.57%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R6
IVAEX24.580.09
+0.37%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl I

FBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSFF and SWVL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSFF and SWVL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSFF
1D Price
Change %
FBSFF100%
N/A
SWVL - FBSFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.16%
EBYH - FBSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBLG - FBSFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
EMCHF - FBSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMZNF - FBSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FMZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMZNF and HSTM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMZNF and HSTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMZNF
1D Price
Change %
FMZNF100%
N/A
HSTM - FMZNF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
AGYS - FMZNF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
BLBX - FMZNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
BNZI - FMZNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-8.28%
VRAR - FMZNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
More