Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBSAX vs JVMCX
FBSAX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FBSAX vs JVMCX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Adv
Price$38.64
Change+$0.24 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.44M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
FBSAX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBSAX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBSAX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. FBSAX (755M). FBSAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FBSAX (1.33) vs JVMCX (0.00). FBSAX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FBSAX (25 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FBSAX (0.67). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FBSAX (37.84). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBSAX: JVMCX (1000) vs FBSAX (100000). FBSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.27 vs. JVMCX (-6.45). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.87 vs. FBSAX (34.72).
| FBSAX | JVMCX | FBSAX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.85 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.86 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.430 | 8.893 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 755M | 23.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | -6.45 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.39 | 21.60 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | 40.87 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.25 | 38.46 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement