FBPI
Price
$11.00
Change
+$0.35 (+3.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.06M
53 days until earnings call
FDVA
Price
$11.75
Change
-$0.05 (-0.42%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
90.18M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBPI vs FDVA

Header iconFBPI vs FDVA Comparison
Open Charts FBPI vs FDVABanner chart's image
First Bancorp of Indiana
Price$11.00
Change+$0.35 (+3.29%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization16.06M
FREEDOM FINL
Price$11.75
Change-$0.05 (-0.42%)
Volume$3.79K
Capitalization90.18M
FBPI vs FDVA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBPI vs. FDVA commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBPI is a StrongBuy and FDVA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FBPI: $11.00 vs. FDVA: $11.75)
Brand notoriety: FBPI and FDVA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBPI: 218% vs. FDVA: 290%
Market capitalization -- FBPI: $16.06M vs. FDVA: $90.18M
FBPI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.06M. FDVA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $90.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBPI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFDVA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBPI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FDVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBPI is a better buy in the long-term than FDVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBPI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDVA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBPI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FDVA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBPI is a better buy in the short-term than FDVA.

Price Growth

FBPI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.00% price change this week, while FDVA (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBPI is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

FDVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDVA($90.2M) has a higher market cap than FBPI($16.1M). FDVA has higher P/E ratio than FBPI: FDVA (55.95) vs FBPI (10.46). FDVA YTD gains are higher at: 13.857 vs. FBPI (11.675). FDVA has less debt than FBPI: FDVA (61.7M) vs FBPI (101M).
FBPIFDVAFBPI / FDVA
Capitalization16.1M90.2M18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.67513.85784%
P/E Ratio10.4655.9519%
RevenueN/A29.8M-
Total CashN/A4.11M-
Total Debt101M61.7M164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBPI vs FDVA: Fundamental Ratings
FBPI
FDVA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
686
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBPI's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDVA (92). This means that FBPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

FDVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBPI (100). This means that FDVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBPI’s over the last 12 months.

FBPI's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDVA (86). This means that FBPI’s stock grew significantly faster than FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

FBPI's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FDVA (53). This means that FBPI’s stock grew similarly to FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

FDVA's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FBPI (21). This means that FDVA’s stock grew similarly to FBPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBPIFDVA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
23%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LQMT0.14N/A
+2.96%
Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.
SBGSY51.170.46
+0.91%
Schneider Electric SE
KTHGF0.03N/A
N/A
Kantone Holdings Ltd.
JCYCF21.21N/A
N/A
Jardine Cycle & Carriage Limited
TSIOF0.78N/A
N/A
361 Degrees International Limited

FBPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBPI and KISB have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBPI and KISB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBPI
1D Price
Change %
FBPI100%
+3.29%
KISB - FBPI
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
FBSI - FBPI
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - FBPI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBTT - FBPI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDVA - FBPI
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FDVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDVA and FBSI have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDVA and FBSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDVA
1D Price
Change %
FDVA100%
N/A
FBSI - FDVA
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCOB - FDVA
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPI - FDVA
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
FBTT - FDVA
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPA - FDVA
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More