FBPA
Price
$26.00
Change
+$0.50 (+1.96%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
28.18M
MCHB
Price
$13.91
Change
+$0.16 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBPA vs MCHB

Header iconFBPA vs MCHB Comparison
Open Charts FBPA vs MCHBBanner chart's image
Farmers Bank of Appomattox (VA)
Price$26.00
Change+$0.50 (+1.96%)
Volume$894
Capitalization28.18M
Mechanics Ban
Price$13.91
Change+$0.16 (+1.16%)
Volume$256.87K
Capitalization3.06B
FBPA vs MCHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBPA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBPA vs. MCHB commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBPA is a StrongBuy and MCHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FBPA: $26.00 vs. MCHB: $13.91)
Brand notoriety: FBPA and MCHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBPA: 137% vs. MCHB: 196%
Market capitalization -- FBPA: $28.18M vs. MCHB: $3.06B
FBPA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28.18M. MCHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBPA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBPA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FBPA and MCHB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBPA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBPA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHB is a better buy in the short-term than FBPA.

Price Growth

FBPA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while MCHB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCHB is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHB($3.06B) has a higher market cap than FBPA($28.2M). MCHB has higher P/E ratio than FBPA: MCHB (16.51) vs FBPA (9.63). FBPA YTD gains are higher at: 19.710 vs. MCHB (-99.948).
FBPAMCHBFBPA / MCHB
Capitalization28.2M3.06B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.710-99.948-20%
P/E Ratio9.6316.5158%
Revenue13.3MN/A-
Total Cash3.82MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBPA vs MCHB: Fundamental Ratings
FBPA
MCHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3389
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
7015
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4799
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHB's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as FBPA (79). This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

FBPA's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHB (100). This means that FBPA’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBPA (70). This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

FBPA's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (99). This means that FBPA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FBPA (38). This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to FBPA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBPAMCHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBPA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEURX42.440.47
+1.12%
Vanguard European Stock Investor
MINVX29.000.29
+1.01%
Madison Large Cap Y
AADEX29.230.29
+1.00%
American Beacon Large Cap Value R5
BEGIX22.240.20
+0.91%
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl
ETAEX14.27-0.02
-0.14%
Eventide Exponential Technologies A

FBPA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBPA and MNMB have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBPA and MNMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBPA
1D Price
Change %
FBPA100%
N/A
MNMB - FBPA
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHB - FBPA
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
BNCDY - FBPA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
FCOB - FBPA
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
FCCT - FBPA
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
More

MCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHB
1D Price
Change %
MCHB100%
+1.16%
GPFOF - MCHB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OSBK - MCHB
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLX - MCHB
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
FBPA - MCHB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More