Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs SFCWX
FBOGX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs SFCWX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.83
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets792.66M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$76.52
Change-$0.15 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
FBOGX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. SFCWX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. FBOGX (793M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: FBOGX (1.39) vs SFCWX (0.90). FBOGX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: FBOGX (12 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). FBOGX (0.96) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). SFCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). FBOGX (1000000) and SFCWX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. FBOGX (-3.43). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.29 vs. FBOGX (5.30).
| FBOGX | SFCWX | FBOGX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.65 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.65 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.692 | 11.143 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 793M | 80.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.90 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.43 | 6.80 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.26 | 42.09 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.30 | 10.29 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement