Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$10.14
Change+$0.22 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets820.53M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$80.91
Change+$1.64 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. FBOGX (821M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.58) vs RSLFX (0.92). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (13 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). FBOGX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FBOGX (15.75). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. FBOGX (7.26). FBOGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.17 vs. RSLFX (-5.53).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.178 | 4.792 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 821M | 82.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.92 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.26 | 13.90 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.01 | 25.87 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.17 | -5.53 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.19 | 112.27 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers