Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLFX
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLFX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets804.67M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$80.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
FBOGX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. FBOGX (805M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: FBOGX (1.67) vs RSLFX (0.95). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: FBOGX (13 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). FBOGX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLFX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.20 vs. FBOGX (8.13). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.83 vs. FBOGX (-5.28).
| FBOGX | RSLFX | FBOGX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.70 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.246 | 4.209 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 805M | 82.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.95 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.13 | 16.20 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.34 | 31.12 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.28 | -2.83 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.52 | 107.91 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement