Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLDX
FBOGX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLDX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$10.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.76M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$76.45
Change+$0.30 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
FBOGX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLDX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. FBOGX (836M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: FBOGX (1.38) vs RSLDX (0.79). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: FBOGX (12 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). FBOGX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). RSLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLDX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.59 vs. FBOGX (4.65). RSLDX return over 5 years is better than : 19.17 vs. FBOGX (15.68).
| FBOGX | RSLDX | FBOGX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.80 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.80 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.017 | 11.873 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 836M | 81.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.79 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 12.59 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.51 | 37.55 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.68 | 19.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement