Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$10.14
Change+$0.22 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets820.53M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.30
Change+$0.97 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. FBOGX (821M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.58) vs RSLBX (0.19). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (13 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.98). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FBOGX (15.75). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. FBOGX (7.26). FBOGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.17 vs. RSLBX (-12.64).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.74 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.74 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.178 | 4.706 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 821M | 82.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.19 | 822% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.26 | 11.64 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.01 | 20.82 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.17 | -12.64 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.19 | 82.58 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers