Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets804.67M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.98
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. FBOGX (805M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.67) vs RSLBX (0.20). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (13 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. FBOGX (8.13). FBOGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.28 vs. RSLBX (-10.14).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.74 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.74 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.246 | 4.185 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 805M | 82.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.20 | 840% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.13 | 13.89 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.34 | 25.85 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.28 | -10.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.52 | 78.84 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement