Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.91
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets789.46M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.41
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.6B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. FBOGX (789M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.42) vs RSLBX (0.06). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (13 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. FBOGX (-1.02). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 1.80 vs. FBOGX (1.33).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.536 | 11.252 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 789M | 81.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.06 | 2,547% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | 6.71 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.23 | 28.12 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.33 | 1.80 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.74 | 48.44 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement