Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBOGX vs RSLBX
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FBOGX vs RSLBX
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$10.04
Change+$0.09 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets795.31M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.80
Change-$0.17 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.25B
FBOGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOGX vs. RSLBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOGX is a Buy and RSLBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 83.3B vs. FBOGX (795M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FBOGX (1.40) vs RSLBX (0.05). FBOGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FBOGX (13 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: RSLBX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.83 vs. FBOGX (-1.97). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : -2.84 vs. FBOGX (-3.33).
| FBOGX | RSLBX | FBOGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.75 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.852 | 12.235 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 795M | 83.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.05 | 2,556% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.97 | 5.83 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.64 | 27.58 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.33 | -2.84 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.65 | 46.13 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement