Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMCX vs HBLCX
FBMCX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FBMCX vs HBLCX
Franklin Managed Income C
Price$12.55
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.32B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.62
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
FBMCX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMCX vs. HBLCX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMCX is a Buy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FBMCX (3.32B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FBMCX (3.63) vs HBLCX (2.64). FBMCX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FBMCX (19 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). FBMCX (1.66) and HBLCX (1.64) have similar cost to investors . HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FBMCX (31.92). FBMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FBMCX (1000) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.92 vs. FBMCX (2.48). FBMCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.39 vs. HBLCX (11.02).
| FBMCX | HBLCX | FBMCX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.64 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.64 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.958 | 6.459 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 11.9B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 2.64 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 2.92 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.42 | 9.64 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.39 | 11.02 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.82 | 35.45 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers