Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKTX vs MFJCX
FBKTX vs MFJCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKTX vs. MFJCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKTX is a Hold and MFJCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBKTX has more cash in the bank: 18.3B vs. MFJCX (258M). MFJCX pays higher dividends than FBKTX: MFJCX (1.34) vs FBKTX (0.93). FBKTX was incepted earlier than MFJCX: FBKTX (11 years) vs MFJCX (9 years). MFJCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FBKTX (0.48). MFJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FBKTX (5.00). FBKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJCX: FBKTX (250) vs MFJCX (1000). FBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. MFJCX (9.74). FBKTX (49.98) and MFJCX (49.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBKTX | MFJCX | FBKTX / MFJCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.58 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.93 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.121 | 14.080 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 258M | 7,093% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | 9.74 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.44 | 47.59 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.98 | 49.38 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement